Surrendering terrorists and the burden of justice

The recent wave of surrender by the members of Boko Haram and Islamic States West African Province (ISWAP) terrorist groups and their families to troops of Operation Hadin Kai (OPHK) in the North-eastern part of the country has become a topic of discourse within security and intelligence circles.

In the last three weeks, more than 1,500 Boko Haram fighters have surrendered and laid down their weapons in drove in different parts of Borno and Yobe states where they had maintained camps and hideouts in recent times.

An intelligence source familiar with the development noted that aside those that had ran out from their enclaves due to the intensity of both artillery and air bombardments from the military, some have surrendered through other arrangements.

The sources believe that no fewer than 1,000 fighters have so far surrendered of which more than 500 women and children had been handed over to Borno state government with two of the 276 schoolgirls abducted in Chibok by the Boko Haram in April 2014, Ruth Pogu and Hassana Adamu, among the women and children received in different locations in Borno.

While Ruth alongside someone she was said to have married during her captivity with two children, surrendered themselves to the military on July 28 at a location in Bama local government area, Hassana Adamu, alongside her two children were received at Gwoza area on August 14.

The source revealed that the operations that led to the surrender of the repentant terrorists and their families were carried out in tandem with international laws and best practices as regards the case of terrorists that were willing to surrender.

Military throws light

The director, Army Public Relations, Brig-Gen Onyema Nwachukwu, in the statements announcing the surrendering of the terrorists said that the sustained military operation had exerted much pressure on the terrorists who had deserted their various hideouts and camps while those who were convinced that surrendering with their families was the best option surrendered to the troops.

Nwachukwu said that during profiling, some of the Boko Haram commanders who surrendered to troops admitted that their various enclaves were currently plagued with severe hardship such as hunger, disease and the fear of military offensives.

He added that the surrendered terrorists had, hitherto, hibernated around the fringes of Sambisa forest area of Borno before yielding to troops’ heavy artillery and air bombardments with their weapons and incendiaries.

What awaits repentant militants

However, Gov Babagana Zulum of Borno and other well-meaning Nigerians have continued to applaud the new development with the belief that the end to insurgency in the North-east may be in sight while some groups and individuals have expressed reservations on how the repentant terrorists could be pardoned.

Fact about repentant terrorists is that the military is not responsible for their rehabilitation, de-radicalisation and reintegration but the Nigerian government through Operation Safe Corridor established by the government in 2016 as part of a national strategy to degrade militant activities in the North-eastern part of the country to receive repentant Boko Haram and Islamic State in West Africa Province (ISWAP) who voluntarily defected from the groups.

The programme’s aim is to rehabilitate repentant Boko Haram militants and reintegrate them into their respective communities as productive law-abiding citizens though with strong reservation and criticism against it.

The defecting members would acquire vocational training, access de-radicalisation and civics programme to become useful members of their society upon release from the programme and the programme’s core target group is low-level jihadist recruits who perform combatant and/or non-combatant roles but desire to escape the movement they were coerced into joining.

There are international humanitarian laws guiding the rule of surrender by a known terrorist or criminal who has decided to denounce his membership and ideology of the group that made him to take up arms against the state in the first place.

Int’l law dimension

Russell Buchan, a senior lecturer in International Law, University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, in his article entitled ‘The Rule of Surrender in International Humanitarian Law’ published in 2018 said the act of surrender possessed a political, military and legal dimension.

Buchan explained that the political dimension in the act of surrender indicated that a surrendering party had been defeated and the opposing force has been victorious.

In its military context, he said the act of surrender meant that the person surrendering was no longer engaged in hostilities while the legal dimension is where a valid offer of surrender was communicated to and received by an opposing force.

According to him, the opposing force is legally obligated to accept that offer and refrain from making surrendered persons the object of attack, observing that the view that surrendered forces should not be made the object of attack is supported by the principles of military necessity and humanity.

“Where persons clearly indicate that they no longer intend to participate in hostilities, they no longer represent a threat to military security and thus there is no military necessity to target them.

“Moreover, to target persons who have placed themselves outside the theatre of war constitutes an unacceptable and indefensible affront to human dignity,’’ he said.


Gov Zulum, while acknowledging the effort of the military, said that the ongoing surrender of Boko Haram terrorists had presented the state with two extremely difficult situations requiring stakeholders’ serious examination of the wider implications.

He said that stakeholders needed a well-thought-out critical framework that would either accept the surrendering terrorists or reject them and continuing with the war.

Zulum explained that he would engage in high-level consultations with President Muhammadu Buhari, Service Chiefs and resident security heads, traditional rulers, elders and religious leaders, national and state assembly members, academics and other stakeholders particularly victims of the crimes perpetrated by the insurgents so that stakeholders would critically review the situation for a framework on how to move forward.

According to him, no one would find it easy to accept killers of his or her parents, children and other loved ones.

“In the last 12 years, we have been in this war and we have lost thousands of fellow citizens.

“We don’t know the where-about of thousands of others. We don’t know whether they are alive or dead.

“In these 12 years, millions have been made homeless and many wealthy farmers, transporters and others have been rendered poor.

“In these years, we were able to cultivate maybe around three per cent of the arable land.

“As a result, our people became dependent on food aid amid donor fatigue and potential food insecurity.

“In fact, the repercussions of the Boko Haram crisis are enormous and as someone who has been involved with assessment of the impacts and rebuilding efforts in the last seven years, I am in position to know the endless negative impact the Boko Haram has made in Borno.

“Accepting Boko Haram has the risk of seriously offending the feelings of victims with potential of civil rebellion, just as there is the risk that if Boko Haram fighters willing to surrender are rejected, they can join ISWAP to swell the ranks of fighters in the bush and the path of peace becomes narrowed,’’ he said.

Meanwhile, leaders of the northern socio-cultural group the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), said that there should be no pity but a full-scale trial for repentant Boko Haram members, while warning the government against accepting the surrender overture of terrorists.

The national chairman of ACF, Audu Ogbeh, while addressing newsmen recently, maintained that if the deadly Boko Haram members would be set free, the government should as well free all those in custody in any part of the country for one crime or another.

According to Ogbe, the terrorists, who got a slap on the wrist, were bomb makers, commanders, arsonists, rapists, and kidnappers, saying that surrendering was not enough to bring relief to thousands of Nigerians or even those killed.

“So, what do we do with them? Should we just embrace them and trust them wholesale? Are their moves informed by altruistic repentance? We seriously doubt. Bring them to trial, or free all others presently in custody anywhere,’’ he said.