Naira redesign: Abuja court strikes out N1bn suit against Buhari, others

Justice Inyang Edem Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja Monday struck out a N1 billion suit instituted against former President Muhammadu Buhari and former governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Godwin Emefiele, over the hardship caused by the 2023 naira redesign policy.

The suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/418/2023, was instituted by an Abuja-based legal practitioner, Uthman Isa Tochukwu, on the grounds of lack of diligent prosecution of the case.

However, in a ruling, Justice Ekwo said he was convinced that the plaintiff had deliberately abandoned his own case due to his persistent absence in court without legal representation and any explanation.

The plaintiff had dragged the former president, the Attorney General of the Federation, former governor of the CBN, CBN and two commercial banks before the court claiming that they inflicted series of hardships on him during the redesign of the naira.

In the suit filed on his behalf by his counsel, Bala Dakum, the plaintiff alleged that his fundamental rights to freedom of movement and dignity of his person were violently breached.

He prayed the court to award N1 billion damages against the defendants to be paid to him for the breach of his fundamental rights.

The plaintiff also demanded an order of perpetual injunction against Buhari and others restraining them from further withholding the old N200, N500 and N1000 denominations.

Similarly, he demanded that the court compel the defendants to tender public apology to be published in two major newspapers in the country.

But at the proceedings, both the plaintiff and his counsel were not in court and did not offer any excuse for their absence.

Counsel to the 3rd and 4th defendants (Emefiele and CBN) Mr Chikelue Amasiani said since the suit was filed in 2023, both the plaintiff and his lawyer have not shown any seriousness and commitment to the prosecution of the case.

Justice Ekwo agreed with the lawyer and struck out the suit in a brief ruling.

0Shares