Th e mixed reactions from the North that greeted the quit notice issued by a group of elderly looking individuals, known as Arewa youths, which gave Nigerians of South east region up until October 1, this year to vacate the region, may have given way to complete solidarity with this group and what they stand for by northern political establishment.
Th e way and manner, the leaders of a group of Nigerians threatening forceful ejection of fellow Nigerians from a part of the sovereign territory of Nigeria and are being indulged by the leading fi gures of the northern political establishment may have legitimized the ultimatum given to Igbo people living in northern Nigeria. For a country, whose political leadership has often declared in rigid terms, the nonnegotiability of Nigeria’s unity and oneness, the quit notice on citizens from the South-east to leave the North, presents a tragic situation of double jeopardy for the Nigerian Igbo.
Th e voices of reason have loudly gone grave yard silent. Th e patriotic stand of Gov Nasir El Rufai of Kaduna state, which not only condemned the very irresponsible statements dripping with hate by the group but called for their immediate arrest has been overtaken by the unpatriotic voice of Gov Kashim Shettima, whom, as chairman of northern governor’s forum has failed to condemn the group’s open call for violence and anarchy but instead has engaged in indulging the group by hosting their leaders in Maiduguri, after which the group not only maintained its stand but reiterated the sanctity of the October 1 deadline for the Igbo resident in northern Nigeria to move out or be moved out. Th e patriotic voice of the Emir of Katsina, which not only condemned the group and their treasonable statement but assured every Igbo living in his domain of safety as his beloved children, may have given way to the unpatriotic voice of the Sultan of Sokoto, the traditional head of conservative Muslim North and leader of Nigerian Muslims, when he failed to condemn in strong terms, the treasonable statement of Arewa youths, but declared that the group’s threat is being discussed to bring about an amicable solution to the crisis.
It gives an impression of tacit support for this unfortunate quit notice by northern establishment for the Arewa youths. It is morally wrong to indulge a group of people who are threatening forceful ejection of citizens of Nigeria from their chosen places of residence anywhere within the country. As D-Day approaches, opinion of hate against the Igbo living in the North is being mobilized by infl uential institutions and individuals across board. Th e local songs of hate depicting the Igbo as harmful mosquitoes that must be gotten rid of, freely circulating in the North is frightening if only the history of the April 1994 genocide in Rwanda is revisited, where blood sucking Hutu militia men, described Tutsis as cockroaches who must be smashed in the head. Similarly, some northern mass media like their Hutu counterparts in the prelude to the 1994 carnage are promoting tales of hate and animosity against the Igbo. Worth mentioning here, is an editorial that Leadership newspaper ran in the heat of the furore generated by the Arewa quit notice on the northern Igbo, blaming them for the incidences of the fi rst coup in 1966, which was led by predominantly Igbo ethnic military offi cers, which unfortunately led to the assassination of leading northern political and military leaders. Th e unfortunate incident claimed the lives of the very revered Premier of Northern Nigeria Sir Ahmadu Bello and then Prime Minister of Nigeria Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa. Like the rekindling of bitter memories of the Hutu History of Belgian oppressive colonial rule over Rwanda that saw the elevation of the head [Nwami] of minority Tutsi, as active collaborators over the Hutu majority, which set the stage for the mass killings that followed, the representation of the 1966 coup as Igbo is having the same eff ect as the bitter memories of the Nwami rule in Rwanda. Another dimension to this plot is the obvious envy and, sometimes, hate that the success of the Igbo attracts to them by their host communities. Th e warped impression is that Igbo people are the greatest benefi ciaries of the Nigerian union, because “they are allowed to settle everywhere and prosper”. Th is poisoned chaliced impression that citizens of a country are being done a special favour by being allowed free movement around their country is largely responsible for the covetous target of their massive multi-trillion naira investments, assets and properties by the promoters of this agenda. Again, they failed to learn from the experience of Uganda following the toppling of President Milton Obote by Idi Amin Dada in 1973. Native Ugandans, who clearly lacked the perquisite skills of managing successful businesses like resident Europeans and Asians, nevertheless blamed the skilled expatriates for their poverty. Th e subsequent mob action that followed the forceful take over of foreign owned enterprises and mass ejection of expatriates failed to lead to the economic Utopia the natives had hoped for. Th e average Igbo man works hard to achieve his current economic status, which was not thrust upon him by any special favours. Th e most unfortunate thing about this baying for the blood of fellow citizens of Eastern region by the Arewa youths is the obvious helplessness of the situation by the Buhari/ Osinbajo led federal government given the fact that the prevailing anti-sentiment in the North was actually accentuated by the President’s non-conciliatory posture towards the Igbo who voted against him in the 2015 general elections. His punitive pronouncement and near total implementation of his 95 per cent to 5 per cent proportionality in the distribution of government patronage helped to stoke the fi re of hate against the Igbo in his home region of Northern Nigeria. President Buhari’s inability to carry out the very important task of healing the wounds opened by a fractious electoral process but instead showed preference for his own people is an unforgivable error in the art of statesmanship. Th e political dimension to this unfolding scenario was once again brought to the fore, when a leading northern publication, Daily Trust, during the week ran an exclusive story accusing members of House of Representatives from the South-east and Southsouth regions of putting the speaker under immense pressure to constitute a medical panel with the ultimate aim of getting the Federal Executive Council to declare President Buhari incapacitated and unable to continue to discharge his functions as commander in chief. Th is allegation, which has been denied swiftly by the people concerned, has the potential to further stoke anti-Igbo sentiment in the North in preparation for the October 1 D-Day .Th e Vice President, who appears to be merely acting as Acting President, in a clear case of a bizarre political drama of power play between him and Buhari’s powerful kitchen cabinet, is evidently unable to take the fi rm and decisive action the grave situation demands. Unfortunately, this quit notice is a blanket one against all Igbo including all but the few of President’s supporters from the South-east who are mostly opposed to Nnamdi Kanu’s separatists’ movement because of their abiding faith in Buhari, their hero. Th is quit notice does not exempt Osita Okechukwu, a very loyal and dedicated person to Muhammadu Buhari’s aspiration to lead Nigeria since his fi rst attempt in 2003. How about Joe Igbokwe, the very vocal apostle of home truth to fellow Igbo and defender of the president’s policies and programmes is also not exempted. Lauretta Onochie, the very dutiful and dedicated media aide and the nightmare of the opposition PDP is not exempted from this threat. Likewise, Ogbonnaya Onu, Rochas Okorocha, Chris Nwabueze Ngige, Festus Odimegwu and so many other illustrious sons and daughters of Igbo land who defi ed ethno-religious sentiments and stood fi rmly for the president are not exempted from this quit notice. Th e presidency may consider taking a strong action to rein in the issuers of threat, their collaborators and supporters to avert a likely bloodshed that may result from any attempt to implement the quit notice on the Igbo; at least for the sake of the president’s Igbo supporters who may be worse aff ected by this impending double jeopardy.
